1. Home
  2. Events
  3. 33rd Federation Cup Basketball Championship
  4. Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow v Army Service Corps, Bangalore
33rd Federation Cup Basketball Championship Group A
Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow 45 — 52 Army Service Corps, Bangalore
Gautam Buddha University Court 1 12 Jun 2019 GMT 12:00:00 Local 00:00:00
Game summary

Score by period

Teams Quarter1 Quarter2 Quarter3 Quarter4
Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow (45 points) 13 13 13 6
Army Service Corps, Bangalore (52 points) 16 4 18 14
45 PTS
Jersey Player FG(2) FG(3) FT Pts Reb AST TO STL BLK Fouls Time
4 Akash Bhancin(c) 2/? 0/? 1/? 5 3 ?:?
5 Ankur Singh 1/? 5/? 1/? 18 0 ?:?
9 Vikram Pam 4/? 0/? 0/? 8 3 ?:?
11 Aniket Malik 0/? 0/? 0/? 0 0 ?:?
12 Rakesh Kumar Singh 3/? 0/? 1/? 7 2 0:0
13 Jj ?/? ?/? ?/? ?:?
14 Abhishek Kumar Singh ?/? ?/? ?/? 0:0
22 Pulkit Sachdeva 0/? 0/? 1/? 1 1 ?:?
23 Vijay Parmar 0/? 2/? 0/? 6 2 ?:?
88 Santosh Kumar Singh ?/? ?/? ?/? 0:0
52 PTS
Jersey Player FG(2) FG(3) FT Pts Reb AST TO STL BLK Fouls Time
4 Vivekanada Das(c) 0/? 0/? 0/? 0 0 ?:?
5 Balwan 0/? 0/? 0/? 0 0 ?:?
6 Saif ?/? ?/? ?/? 0:0
7 Rinku 7/? 2/? 0/? 20 1 ?:?
8 Shashi Kumar 3/? 0/? 0/? 6 4 ?:?
9 A Pandiyan 0/? 0/? 0/? 0 0 ?:?
10 Prabhu Mohan 2/? 0/? 4/? 8 8 ?:?
11 K P Sharath 0/? 0/? 0/? 0 0 ?:?
12 Pellippan 0/? 0/? 0/? 0 0 ?:?
13 Ajmal 0/? 1/? 0/? 3 4 ?:?
14 Varinder Singh 0/? 0/? 0/? 0 0 ?:?
15 Akhil Mubayakar 2/? 3/? 2/? 15 1 ?:?
Notes —
Game personnel

Officials & team staff

Official Name
Referee Amarjot Singh
Referee Sandeep Saluja
Referee Alan Jose
Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknows Coach Manoj Dubey
Army Service Corps, Bangalores Coach G R L Prasad
Army Service Corps, Bangalores Assistant Coach R Jayarengan
Period-by-period

How the game developed

Period scores and the running total using the recorded quarter and overtime data.

Q1
Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow
13
Army Service Corps, Bangalore
16
Running score 13–16
Q2
Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow
13
Army Service Corps, Bangalore
4
Running score 26–20
Q3
Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow
13
Army Service Corps, Bangalore
18
Running score 39–38
Q4
Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow
6
Army Service Corps, Bangalore
14
Running score 45–52
Side by side

Team comparison

Totals are calculated only from recorded player values. Partial coverage is identified.

Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow Match totals Army Service Corps, Bangalore
45
Points partial
52
N/A
Rebounds partial
N/A
N/A
Assists partial
N/A
N/A
Turnovers partial
N/A
N/A
Steals partial
N/A
N/A
Blocks partial
N/A
11
Fouls partial
18
Individual performance

Player impact

Leaders and scoring contribution calculated from recorded player totals.

Rebounds leaders
N/A
Assists leaders
N/A
Steals leaders
N/A
Blocks leaders
N/A

Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow scoring contribution

Ankur Singh 18 pts
40%
Vikram Pam 8 pts
17.8%
Rakesh Kumar Singh 7 pts · 0:00
15.6%
Vijay Parmar 6 pts
13.3%
Akash Bhancin(c) 5 pts
11.1%
Pulkit Sachdeva 1 pts
2.2%
Aniket Malik 0 pts
0%

Army Service Corps, Bangalore scoring contribution

Rinku 20 pts
38.5%
Akhil Mubayakar 15 pts
28.8%
Prabhu Mohan 8 pts
15.4%
Shashi Kumar 6 pts
11.5%
Ajmal 3 pts
5.8%
Vivekanada Das(c) 0 pts
0%
Balwan 0 pts
0%
A Pandiyan 0 pts
0%
K P Sharath 0 pts
0%
Pellippan 0 pts
0%
Varinder Singh 0 pts
0%
Shot efficiency

Shooting analysis

Made shots, total attempts and advanced percentages are shown only when the required inputs exist.

Research Designs and Standards Organisation, Lucknow

2PT N/A Attempts unavailable
3PT N/A Attempts unavailable
FT N/A Attempts unavailable
Effective FG N/A
True shooting N/A
Assist / turnover N/A

Army Service Corps, Bangalore

2PT N/A Attempts unavailable
3PT N/A Attempts unavailable
FT N/A Attempts unavailable
Effective FG N/A
True shooting N/A
Assist / turnover N/A
eFG% and true-shooting percentage require complete made/attempted shooting data. They remain N/A when coverage is incomplete.